Anti-E1E2 antibodies do predict response to triple therapy in treatment-experienced Hepatitis C Virus-cirrhosis cases.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously showed that pre-treatment serum anti-E1E2 predicted hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral kinetics (VKs) and treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon/ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) double therapy. Here, we determined whether baseline anti-E1E2 was correlated with the on-treatment VK and could predict virological outcome in treatment-experienced HCV-infected cirrhotic patients receiving protease inhibitor-based triple therapy. METHODS: Sera from 19 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and compensated cirrhosis who failed to respond to a prior course of Peg-IFN/RBV were selected at time 0 before starting triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir. We assessed patients with sustained viral response 12 weeks after the end of triple therapy (SVR12) by analyzing VKs at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (end of treatment) and 60. RESULTS: Patients baseline characteristics were similar to the well-defined CUPIC cohort (age, HCV subtype, baseline viremia, and treatment history). Among the 19 patients, 11 achieved an SVR12. Fifteen patients were positive for pre-treatment anti-E1E2 and all of them achieved SVR12. Moreover, anti-E1E2 and SVR12 correlated with prior response to IFN/RBV therapy (relapse, partial or null response). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline anti-E1E2 could be considered as a new biomarker to predict SVR12 after triple therapy in this most difficult-to-treat population. These results warrant further validation on larger cohorts including patients receiving highly effective direct-acting antivirals to explore whether this test could help in better defining treatment duration for these very costly molecules.

Predictors of the therapeutic response in hepatitis C. A 2013 update.

Chronic hepatitis C is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current therapy based on pegylated-interferon-α (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination has limited efficacy and is poorly tolerated. Disease progression is highly variable and pre-therapeutic prediction of response to treatment remains difficult. Although viral kinetics proved most useful to monitor duration of therapy, other predictors would be helpful to identify patients with the best chance of subsequent treatment response prior initiation of antiviral therapy (double or triple therapy). The predictive power of IL28B polymorphism is well-recognized and has become the reference biomarker for clinicians in patients treated with double therapy. The combination of serum IP-10 and IL28B SNPs increases predictive value of treatment response. Recently, anti-E1E2 antibodies appear to closely correlate with therapeutic outcome and predict the complete elimination of HCV. They may represent a new relevant prognostic biomarker of double therapy response. Since the introduction of triple therapy including protease inhibitors (telaprevir/boceprevir), the major priority is to help patients who failed on double therapy, and there is now an urgent need for robust pre-therapeutic predictors of response to better select the patients to treat. Indeed, the relevance of IL28B polymorphism and IP-10 serum concentration are limited in triple therapy. Many new drugs are currently under investigation and there is hope that effective and well-tolerated IFN-free regimens may become a part of future therapy. In this context, this will help to identify the most powerful predictive marker and/or to assess the benefit of anti-E1E2 in decision to treat.

Pretreatment predictive factors for hepatitis C therapy outcome: relevance of anti-E1E2 antibodies compared to IP-10 and IL28B genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Unique serum anti-E1E2 antibodies were shown to be associated with spontaneous recovery or predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy. The objectives were to establish the relationship between pretreatment anti-E1E2 titres and HCV RNA kinetics during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, and to examine whether the combined determination of interleukin (IL)28B rs12979860 and rs8099917, pretreatment inducible protein (IP)-10 levels and/or anti-E1E2 improved the prediction of SVR. METHODS: Sera from 26 treatment-naive consecutive HCV patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV for 48 weeks were analysed. Serum anti-E1E2 titres and pretreatment IP-10 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The IL28B variants were determined using genotyping real-time polymerase chain reaction method. Viral decline was measured at weeks (W) 4 and 12 and SVR assessed 6 months after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Baseline anti-E1E2 titres were correlated with HCV RNA decline at W4 and W12 and were highly predictive of SVR with 100% of patients negative for anti-E1E2 failing to achieve SVR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicate that the best prediction of SVR (AUC 0.990) was obtained with the combination of anti-E1E2 and IP-10 levels. Predictive values were better than those obtained with IP-10 alone or in combination with IL28B variants. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment serum anti-E1E2 response predicts HCV RNA clearance kinetics and treatment outcome. The combination of anti-E1E2 and IP-10 significantly improved the prediction of treatment response. This warrants further investigation and validation on larger cohorts of patients in the context of new therapeutic strategies.